× Key messages Background Content summary Conclusions

Content summary

Telehealth in headache care

  • Telemedicine for headache has been available for several years, is a cost-effective and convenient approach to patient management, with similar satisfaction rates and outcomes.2-4
  • Previous reimbursement and licensing barriers to the use of telemedicine in the US have been lifted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling healthcare professionals to bill for telehealth visits.
  • Switching to telehealth requires planning and preparation prior to installation but also for each patient visit.
  • Despite the initial challenges with initiating telemedicine, there are examples where it has been successfully implemented such as The CHOP child neurology outpatient center.5

Real-world strategies for acute treatment of migraine

  • The main goal of health care providers is to ensure the health and safety of their patients.
  • The AHS guideline for acute treatment of migraine published in 2015, recommends non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans and anti-emetics for acute treatment, which still represent the mainstay of therapy, and may be used in combination.6
  • WHO raised initial concern that NSAIDs may exacerbate COVID-19 symptoms, but the FDA issued an advisory stating it was not aware of scientific evidence connecting the use of NSAIDs with worsening COVID-19 symptoms.
  • New treatment options include gepants, ditans, and some devices.

Real-world strategies for bridge treatment of migraine

  • The health and safety of patients is still the primary goal of treatment and avoidance of in-patient hospital visits.
  • Consideration should be given as to whether the headache is a symptom of COVID-19 and bridge strategies that could be implemented.

Real-world strategies for prevention of migraine

  • To prevent patients from visiting the hospital, treatments such as injections of onabotulinum toxin A injections and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been deferred.
  • In such cases, other preventative treatments should be considered as outlined in the 2012 AHS/ American Academy of Neurology guideline on pharmacologic treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults.7
  • Procedure-only clinics could be feasible if they can be carried out safely with little risk of infection.

Real-world non-medical strategies for prevention of migraine

  • The addition of non-medical strategies could be beneficial for many patients, such as promoting consistent sleep patterns, meals, exercise and stress management, to help maintain normalcy, and boost resilience.
  • Virtual ‘mindfulness’ sessions have been implemented in some clinics and been well attended by patients.

Effects surrounding practice: Advocacy and clinical trials

  • In light of COVID-19, some health insurance companies in the US have relaxed restrictions on treatments, such as ‘fail first’ requirements and prohibitions on simultaneous coverage; however, many still require a case by case review.
  • There have been no changes to national legislation in the US that would increase treatment coverage for migraine patients.
  • On a local level, many coverage decisions are based on the Drug Utilisation Review Board, so engagement with these boards is encouraged.
  • COVID-19 has impacted clinical trials across the globe, with many ongoing trials suspended or slowed and numerous new trials postponed.
  • The FDA issued non-binding recommendations in March 2020 to ensure the safety of clinical trial participants.
  • The recommendations included changes to trial recruitment, the continuation of investigational products and patient monitoring.

Effects surrounding practice: Self-care

  • Burnout and exhaustion were prevalent in healthcare providers before the emergence of COVID-19, but the additional daily stressors brought by the pandemic have added new burdens.
  • Healthcare providers are encouraged to seek wellness advice and practice self-care.